[CS4423]: WK07-1

This commit is contained in:
2025-02-26 09:41:16 +00:00
parent ea2cab8392
commit 7152563a1a
3 changed files with 94 additions and 0 deletions

Binary file not shown.

View File

@ -808,6 +808,100 @@ which, in turn, in matrix language is:
for the vector $c^E = (c_i^E)$ which then is an eigenvector of $A$.
So $c^E$ is an eigenvector of $A$ (but which one?).
\subsubsection{How to find $c^E$ and/or $\lambda$}
If the network is small, one could use the usual method (although it is almost never a good idea).
\begin{enumerate}
\item Find the \textit{characteristic polynomial} $p_A(x)$ of $A$ as \textit{determinant} of the matrix $xI -A$, where $I$ is the $n \times n$ identity matrix.
\item Find the roots $\lambda$ of $p_A(x)$ (i.e., scalars $\lambda$ such that $p_A(\lambda) = 0$).
\item Find a \textit{non-trivial solution} of the linear system $(\lambda I - A) c = 0$ (where $0$ stands for an all-$0$ column vector and $c = (c_1, \dots, c_n)$ is a column of \textit{unknowns}).
\end{enumerate}
For large networks, there is a much better algorithm, such as the \textbf{Power method}, which we will look at later.
\subsubsection{Perron-Frobenius Theory}
Presently, we'll lean that the adjacency matrix always has one eigenvalue which is greater than all the others.
\\\\
A matrix $A$ is called \textbf{reducible} if, for some simultaneous permutations of its rows and columns, it has the block form:
\[
A =
\begin{pmatrix}
A_{1,1} & A_{1,2} \\
o & A_{2,2}
\end{pmatrix}
\]
If $A$ is not reducible, we say that it is \textbf{irreducible}.
The adjacency matrix of a simple graph $G$ is \textbf{irreducible} if and only if $G$ is connected.
\\\\
A matrix $A=(a_{i,j})$ is \textbf{non-negative} is $a_{i,j \geq 0}$ for all $i$, $j$.
For simplicity, we usually write $A \geq 0$.
It is important to node that adjacency matrices are examples of non-negative matrices.
There are similar concepts of, say, positive matrices, negative matrices, etc.
Of particular importance are \textbf{positive vectors}: $v = (v_i)$ is positive for if $v_i > 0$ for all $i$.
We write $v \geq 0$.
\\\\
\textbf{Theorem:} suppose that $A$ is a square, non-negative, \textbf{irreducible} matrix.
Then:
\begin{itemize}
\item $A$ has a real eigenvalue $\lambda = \rho(A)$ and $\lambda > |\lambda'|$ for any other eigenvalue $\lambda'$ of $A$.
$\lambda$ is called the \textbf{Perron root} of $A$.
\item $\lambda$ is a simple root of the characteristic polynomial of $A$ (so has just one corresponding eigenvector).
\item There is an eigenvector, $v$, associated with $\lambda$ such that $v >0$.
\end{itemize}
For us, this means:
\begin{itemize}
\item The adjacency matrix of a connected graph has an eigenvalue that is positive and greater in magnitude than any other.
\item It has an eigenvector $v$ that is positive.
\item $v_i$ is the eigenvector centrality of the node $i$.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Closeness Centrality}
A node $x$ in a network can be regarded as being central if it is \textbf{close} to (many) other nodes, as it can quickly interact with them.
Recalling that $d(i,j)$ is the distance between nodes $i$ and $j$ (i.e., the length of the shortest path between them).
Then, we can use $\frac{1}{d(i,j)}$ as a measure of ``closeness'';
in a simple, \textit{connected} graph $G=(X,E)$ of order $n$, the \textbf{closeness centrality}, $c^C_i$ of node $i$ is defined as:
\[
c_i^C = \frac{1}{\sum_{j \in X} d(i,j)} = \frac{1}{s(i)}
\]
where $s(i)$ is the \textbf{distance sum} for node $i$.
As is usually the case, there is a \textbf{normalised} version of this measure;
the \textbf{normalised closeness centrality} is defined as:
\[
C_i^C = (n-1)c_i^C = \frac{n-1}{\sum_{j \in X} d(i,j)} = \frac{n-1}{s(i)}
\]
Note that $0 \leq C_i^C \leq 1$.
\\\\
The \textbf{distance matrix} of a graph, $G$, of order $n$ is the $n \times n$ matrix $D=(d_{i,j})$ such that:
\[
d_{i,j} = d(i,j)
\]
We'll return to how to compute $D$ later, but for now we note:
\begin{itemize}
\item $s(i)$ is the sum of row $i$ of $D$.
\item If $s$ is the vector of distance sums, then $s = De$ where $e = (1,1, \dots, 1)^T$.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Betweenness Centrality}
In a simple, connected graph $G$, the \textbf{betweenness centrality} $c_i^B$ of node $i$ is defined as:
\[
c_i^B = \sum_j \sum_k \frac{n_i(j,k)}{n(j,k)}, \quad j \neq k \neq 1
\]
where $n(j,k)$ denotes the \textit{number} of shortest paths from node $j$ to node $k$, where $n_i(j,k)$ denotes the number of those shortest paths \textit{passing through} node $i$.
\\\\
In a simple, connected graph $G$, the \textbf{normalised betweenness centrality} $c_i^B$ of node $i$ is defined as:
\[
C_i^B = \frac{c_i^B}{(n-1)(n-2)}
\]